<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bureauista &#187; self-publishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bureauista.com/blog/tag/self-publishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bureauista.com/blog</link>
	<description>This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 19:58:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Self-publishing &#8211; the debate rumbles on</title>
		<link>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/03/self-publishing-the-debate-rumbles-on-2/</link>
		<comments>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/03/self-publishing-the-debate-rumbles-on-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bureauista</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureauista.com/blog/2009/03/22/self-publishing-the-debate-rumbles-on-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Self-publishing: just a case of vanity?</p>
<p>I commented on this post a while back and then forgot all about it until @selfpubreview flagged it up for me on Twitter. The comments thread is an interesting snapshot of both sides of the self-publishing argument.</p>
<p>[In case you can't be bothered to read the whole thing, be assured that I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Jxy3oIvUzMU/ScZzPQQXNPI/AAAAAAAAAKY/mPLEZ8eQuHs/s1600-h/Edward+Bear+looking+into+a+mirror+001.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 272px; height: 268px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Jxy3oIvUzMU/ScZzPQQXNPI/AAAAAAAAAKY/mPLEZ8eQuHs/s320/Edward+Bear+looking+into+a+mirror+001.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5316063116056278258" /></a><br /><span style="font-style:italic;">Self-publishing: just a case of vanity?</span></p>
<p>I commented on <a href="http://editorunleashed.com/2009/01/28/before-you-self-publish/">this post</a> a while back and then forgot all about it until @selfpubreview flagged it up for me on Twitter. The comments thread is an interesting snapshot of both sides of the self-publishing argument.</p>
<p>[In case you can't be bothered to read the whole thing, be assured that I am rabidly in favour of self-publishing, and consider those who dislike it to be backward-looking snobs (though I put it a little more politely in my initial comment).]</p>
<p>Addendum: @selfpubreview&#8217;s <a href="http://www.selfpublishingreview.com/">site</a> looks to be an excellent resource for self-publishing.</p>
<a href='http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/03/self-publishing-the-debate-rumbles-on-2/' class='retweet ' startCount = '0'>Self-publishing &#8211; the debate rumbles on</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/03/self-publishing-the-debate-rumbles-on-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
