<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bureauista &#187; social media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bureauista.com/blog/category/social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bureauista.com/blog</link>
	<description>This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 08:47:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Intimate Internet Radio</title>
		<link>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/09/intimate-internet-radio/</link>
		<comments>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/09/intimate-internet-radio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bureauista</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bureauista.com/blog/?p=309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been an ambition of mine to host an occasional evening chat-based radio station for, oh, at least ten years now. Looking around, I see that technology has now just about made this possible, so I&#8217;m feeling the urge to do something about it, especially as quite a few folks on Twitter seems to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been an ambition of mine to host an occasional evening chat-based radio station for, oh, at least ten years now. Looking around, I see that technology has now just about made this possible, so I&#8217;m feeling the urge to do something about it, especially as quite a few folks on Twitter seems to be doing it quite well (@johncmayer and @enterbelladonna spring to mind).</p>
<p>So now I&#8217;m going to cast about to see if anyone has any advice/suggestions, and to see if anyone would be up for joining me. I envisage the format as being very casual &#8211; maybe just a two-hour show once a month initially, with 2-3 people sitting in a darkened room quaffing a lot of vino and talking amongst themselves, as well as interacting with the audience on the phone and over Twitter. Chat would be loosely based around one or two topics, or around a question that could be crowd-sourced. The idea is not to draw a large audience, but to entertain friends and interested parties. There seems to be a nicely diverse community of folk on Twitter who could get involved. Perhaps the location and hosts could change each time, depending on access to microphones, small soundproofed rooms, etc. It&#8217;s an experiment, basically.</p>
<p>So now I&#8217;m asking for advice. Has anyone done this before? What kind of set up is needed? My investigations so far point to Shoutcast as being a good service for hosting small radio stations. Any other recommendations? And does anyone have a small room where we could meet up and try this out? I&#8217;m willing to fork out for a couple of microphones, but can&#8217;t afford anything too fancy. Anyone fancy being a radio pundit for an evening? Add your thoughts in the comments box or DM me. All input much appreciated.</p>
<a href='http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/09/intimate-internet-radio/' class='retweet ' startCount = '0'>Intimate Internet Radio</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/09/intimate-internet-radio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital identity</title>
		<link>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/08/digital-identity/</link>
		<comments>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/08/digital-identity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 01:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bureauista</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interconnectedness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online persona]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/08/digital-identity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I met @3djamie at the #twee8 Hackney tweetup last Wednesday and met up with him again yesterday to have a chat, seeing as we both work in eLearning. I&#8217;ve found tweet ups to be great for networking with people in my field who have useful ideas and contacts, as well as being an excellent way [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I met <a href="http://twitter.com/3djamie">@3djamie</a> at the #twee8 Hackney tweetup last Wednesday and met up with him again yesterday to have a chat, seeing as we both work in eLearning. I&#8217;ve found tweet ups to be great for networking with people in my field who have useful ideas and contacts, as well as being an excellent way to break the tedium of working from home.</p>
<p>I knew Jamie had looked at my blog before he got in touch with me, and, rather nervously, I asked his opinion about it. As I was doing so I realised that this was the first time I&#8217;d asked anyone for feedback on my online persona, which is crazy if you think about it; I pretty much live online these days, and while a lot of my clients don&#8217;t know about or aren&#8217;t interested in my online persona, increasingly I&#8217;m aware that the boundary between my social and business presence on the web is blurring.</p>
<p>Hitherto, I&#8217;ve been very nervous of these two worlds colliding. I tend to blog about how I&#8217;m feeling, and worry that this is just tmi for potential business partners. Jamie disagreed. He thought my blog was interesting, but was frustrated that it was difficult to find out from it what my work actually involved.</p>
<p>I get a lot of unsolicited feedback on my blog, in the comments, on Twitter, and in person, and I&#8217;ve been surprised at how positive it generally is. I&#8217;m beginning to think I&#8217;ve been a bit cowardly for assuming that I&#8217;ll never work again if potential employers find out I&#8217;m an actual human being, so I&#8217;ve decided to conduct an experiment. As of today, I&#8217;ve brought together pretty much my entire online persona into one space. On my blog I&#8217;ve linked to my business website, linkedin profile, Facebook, Twitter and last.fm profiles on my About page and in the right hand sidebar. On my Google profile I&#8217;ve added my full name and linked again to all these sites.</p>
<p>It remains to be seen how this will affect my blogging. Perhaps my inner censor will filter out overly personal content, but I&#8217;ll try and suppress the urge. In any case, I&#8217;ve never blogged about very private matters, and I&#8217;d certainly never identify or openly criticise a client or an employer online.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious, though, about how other people are managing to negotiate this increasingly interconnected world we live in. Do you keep your private life for meatspace only? Or are you baring your soul online?</p>
<a href='http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/08/digital-identity/' class='retweet ' startCount = '0'>Digital identity</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/08/digital-identity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter: The Honeymoon is over</title>
		<link>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/03/twitter-the-honeymoon-is-over/</link>
		<comments>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/03/twitter-the-honeymoon-is-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bureauista</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ass kissing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter backlash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureauista.com/blog/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Twitter less and less lately, and my enthusiasm for it has waned to almost zero. I&#8217;ve been reading articles about the Twitter backlash. They seem to be suggesting that existing users are turning against Twitter because it is being flooded by hordes of new users sputtering endless inane commentary. I&#8217;m not sure [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Twitter less and less lately, and my enthusiasm for it has waned to almost zero. I&#8217;ve been reading articles about the Twitter backlash. They seem to be suggesting that existing users are turning against Twitter because it is being flooded by hordes of new users sputtering endless inane commentary. I&#8217;m not sure how this can be the case, since one needs to be following these people in order to be aware of what they are saying. I haven&#8217;t followed that many new people recently and I never see the fail whale, so my burgeoning indifference is coming from somewhere else.</p>
<p>I think in part it is to do with the conflict between the professional and private personas that people display online. My favourite Twitter friends are those who tweet about their lives, their feelings, their boyfriend troubles, their everyday traumas and amusements. But a large proportion of the people I follow are there partly or mainly for business, and can&#8217;t risk exposing themselves in that way. In fact, since I&#8217;ve started to meet other users at real life events, and some of those users have enquired as to what I do and requested my business card in order to put me in touch with potential clients, I&#8217;ve felt too constrained to really use Twitter to express myself, as I felt able to do a few months ago.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not complaining. One of the things that I liked about Twitter in the beginning was that I ended up carrying many of my online conversations into meat space, partly because of my involvement in Twestival, but also because of other ad hoc arrangements, like the wonderful Edinburgh Social Media Coffee Morning, pub quizzes, tweet ups and dinners. I still think Twitter is a good way of meeting people. The enthusiasm for tweet ups hints at people&#8217;s desire to form real connections in an environment where they don&#8217;t feel constrained. All of the professional tweeters I&#8217;ve met have been a great deal more interesting in real life than they&#8217;ve allowed themselves to be online.</p>
<p>Another unpleasant new trend I&#8217;ve noticed recently is for users to form small cliques that endlessly ass kiss each other. One of Twitter&#8217;s early strengths was as a recommendation tool, but such recommendations only carry weight if they are done genuinely and sufficiently infrequently so as not to alienate other users. Follow Friday is a good example of this. At the beginning users were recommending quite interesting people to follow. Now they seem to be recommending people they feel they ought to. There is also a rather sickening trend towards false positivity. I think people feel unable to express a negative sentiment in case it reflects badly on them. As a result there are lot of people who project an image of being constantly on the verge of orgasmic bliss. I find these twitterers as irritating as I do those who constantly whinge.</p>
<p>To my mind, Twitter is echoing the trajectory of Blogger back in the early noughties (ironic given Evan Williams&#8217; involvement in both). I had a Blogger blog back in 2002 and found it a good way to start conversations with people. There was a lot of random traffic, and people commented regularly on each other&#8217;s blogs. Today, even established bloggers note the dearth of traffic and commentary on their blogs. People still read blogs, but they&#8217;ve stopped commenting on them, and something similar is happening with Twitter. People are tweeting more but responding less, as Twitter becomes a platform for displaying your business credentials or personal agenda. This has had the twin effect of making me feel like I&#8217;m &#8217;showing off&#8217; when I tweet, and that my followers are &#8217;spying&#8217; on me, rather than engaging with what I say or telling me something real about themselves.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not quite at the point of closing my account, but I think it&#8217;s safe to say my love affair with Twitter is over. I&#8217;ll watch its progress with interest, while keeping my eye out for smaller, newer, more interesting social media platforms.</p>
<a href='http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/03/twitter-the-honeymoon-is-over/' class='retweet ' startCount = '0'>Twitter: The Honeymoon is over</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/03/twitter-the-honeymoon-is-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EdTwestival</title>
		<link>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/02/edtwestival/</link>
		<comments>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/02/edtwestival/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bureauista</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charity: water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edtwestival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twestival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureauista.com/blog/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m too exhausted to write a proper blog post about the EdTwestival, other than to say it was a roaring success, and that we raised over £3,500 for charity: water. I wish I&#8217;d had time to actually talk to all the lovely people who turned up, rather than just thrusting my book of raffle tickets [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m too exhausted to write a proper blog post about the EdTwestival, other than to say it was a roaring success, and that we raised over £3,500 for charity: water. I wish I&#8217;d had time to actually talk to all the lovely people who turned up, rather than just thrusting my book of raffle tickets in their faces and demanding cash, but it was worth it to raise such a lot, and to hammer London for the number of tweets sent about our Twestival.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my outfit, which ought to have won me the &#8216;best-dressed female&#8217; prize, but since I was judging the damn thing, I decided it would be unwise to nominate myself. </p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Jxy3oIvUzMU/SZXDR6pTa3I/AAAAAAAAAJo/yeOVlGNKjAU/s1600-h/1g98u-b76ae0c6b7e9fc6d4907bdabf97a60c8.4994d1ad.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 240px; height: 320px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Jxy3oIvUzMU/SZXDR6pTa3I/AAAAAAAAAJo/yeOVlGNKjAU/s320/1g98u-b76ae0c6b7e9fc6d4907bdabf97a60c8.4994d1ad.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5302358848866315122" /></a></p>
<a href='http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/02/edtwestival/' class='retweet ' startCount = '0'>EdTwestival</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/02/edtwestival/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter: Making and Spreading the News</title>
		<link>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/02/twitter-making-and-spreading-the-news/</link>
		<comments>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/02/twitter-making-and-spreading-the-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bureauista</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twestival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureauista.com/blog/?p=59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to resist the urge to write about Twitter, but it&#8217;s just too interesting not to. I&#8217;ve just got off the phone with a journalist from a Scottish press agency, who wanted to speak to me about my involvement with the Edinburgh Twestival.</p>
<p>When I got involved with planning the event, I had no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to resist the urge to write about Twitter, but it&#8217;s just too interesting not to. I&#8217;ve just got off the phone with a journalist from a Scottish press agency, who wanted to speak to me about my involvement with the <a href="http://edinburgh.twestival.com/">Edinburgh Twestival</a>.</p>
<p>When I got involved with planning the event, I had no idea it was going to be so popular. I naively thought we&#8217;d struggle to sell 40 tickets. In the end, it looks like we&#8217;ll sell more than 200 (170 already gone) and potentially attract as many folk as we can fit in the building. This is great for charity: water (all proceeds from the 180+ Twestivals around the world go to charity), for my social life, and for my local Twitter ranking (25th in Edinburgh, last time I did a vanity search).</p>
<p>But what really interests me is the way local journalists have reacted to it. I contacted <span style="font-style:italic;">The List</span> a few weeks ago to ask if they&#8217;d be interested in featuring EdTwestival. Turns out a lot of the staff are on Twitter already, so they &#8216;got it&#8217; straight away and were very enthusiastic. What&#8217;s more, inspired by us, they set up a Twitter account specifically for <span style="font-style:italic;">The List</span> to stream news.</p>
<p>A couple of weeks later, and <span style="font-style:italic;">The Scotsman</span>, <span style="font-style:italic;">The Herald</span>, and the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/7867612.stm">BBC</a> have picked up on the buzz and are contacting us for stories. BBC Scotland are even coming to the event to live stream it. We&#8217;ve hardly had to do any press ourselves &#8211; Twitter has done all the work for us. By retweeting info about our sponsors, prizes and the bands we&#8217;ve booked, and our followers retweeting the news again, we generated interest organically, and in the process, we&#8217;ve convinced a number of journalists to sign up for Twitter to see what the fuss is about.</p>
<p>The journalist I spoke to today had just joined Twitter and said her conversation with me had &#8216;opened her eyes&#8217; to the potential of it. At one point I started telling her about the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/mediamonkeyblog/2009/feb/04/stephen-fry-stuck-in-lift">Stephen Fry stuck-in-a-lift</a> story, which, as a Twitter addict, I was laughing at as it happened last night. She&#8217;d caught the headlines, but hadn&#8217;t absorbed the details. And then it hit me: here was I explaining the news to a journalist! The only reason that is possible is because of the tremendous meme-spreading, news-generating/promulgating possibilities of Twitter. </p>
<p>So, not only did we not need traditional news media in order to advertise the Edinburgh Twestival, in the process of generating our own hype, we <span style="font-style:italic;">became</span> the news. Changing times indeed.</p>
<a href='http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/02/twitter-making-and-spreading-the-news/' class='retweet ' startCount = '0'>Twitter: Making and Spreading the News</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/02/twitter-making-and-spreading-the-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter 1 BBC 0</title>
		<link>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/01/twitter-1-bbc-0/</link>
		<comments>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/01/twitter-1-bbc-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bureauista</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureauista.com/blog/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree with the BBC&#8217;s decision not to broadcast the DEC&#8217;s Gaza appeal, but I can at least understand why Mark Thompson struggled with it (incidentally, it&#8217;s nice to see citizens complaining about something a little more important than Jonathan Ross for a change). </p>
<p>But what I don&#8217;t understand is their decision not to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree with the BBC&#8217;s decision not to broadcast the DEC&#8217;s Gaza appeal, but I can at least understand why Mark Thompson struggled with it (incidentally, it&#8217;s nice to see citizens complaining about something a little more important than Jonathan Ross for a change). </p>
<p>But what I don&#8217;t understand is their decision not to mention the furore that this decision has created. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jan/26/bbc-gaza-appeal-mps-motion">The Guardian</a> have reported it. <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/01/25/world/main4752239.shtml?source=R">CBS</a> have reported it. As a British citizen I expect the BB-fucking-C to tell me the news, but when I go to the BBC news homepage, it tells me nothing about the 10,000 complaints it has received since refusing to broadcast the appeal, nor does it tell me about the protestors who staged a protest at the BBC&#8217;s offices in Glasgow yesterday.</p>
<p>In fact, I heard about the protest on Twitter first, when someone I follow posted a <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/duncanbrown/3225595079/">picture</a> taken inside the presentation. I flicked through the news sites intermittently for a while, and read nothing, so I retweeted the info. A while later I noticed someone else had retweeted my tweet again, so Twitter users were clearly clamouring for the information.</p>
<p>Four hours later and the Guardian have picked up on the story, but the BBC? They&#8217;re telling me that &#8216;breast ops defy financial gloom&#8217;. I&#8217;ve had a low opinion of the Beeb&#8217;s news production for years, but this really takes the biscuit.</p>
<a href='http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/01/twitter-1-bbc-0/' class='retweet ' startCount = '0'>Twitter 1 BBC 0</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/01/twitter-1-bbc-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New blog</title>
		<link>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/01/new-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/01/new-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bureauista</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pictures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureauista.com/blog/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Because I&#8217;m *such* a prolific blogger, I&#8217;ve decided to start another blog to feed my obsessive need to procrastinate. This one is about pictures, rather than words, though.</p>
<p>Each day I take a look at my Facebook friends feed and have noticed how few people put privacy settings on their photos. This means I frequently find [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because I&#8217;m *such* a prolific blogger, I&#8217;ve decided to start another blog to feed my obsessive need to procrastinate. <a href="http://ninetenthsofthelaw.blogspot.com/">This one</a> is about pictures, rather than words, though.</p>
<p>Each day I take a look at my Facebook friends feed and have noticed how few people put privacy settings on their photos. This means I frequently find myself looking at the photos of complete strangers, some of which are really bizarre, really unusual, or, occasionally, really beautiful. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve decided to share the best of them with you lot (until I get sued).</p>
<a href='http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/01/new-blog/' class='retweet ' startCount = '0'>New blog</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bureauista.com/blog/2009/01/new-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
